Cyberspace has been recognized as a warfighting domain in the US Department of Defense (DoD), yet neither the DoD nor the broader US Government has taken full advantage of military cyber power to defend US interests and project power. One important reason for this is how we choose to consider and describe cyber. Do we treat it as no different from other domains and normalize cyber as a warfighting capability? Or do we recognize it as fundamentally different from other warfighting domains and use cyber-unique approaches? I believe the answer to both questions is “yes”—we need to further normalize cyber as a warfighting capability, yet recognize how it is different from the physical warfighting domains. The key to our future success lies in reconciling these two perspectives.
Demonstrating Value and Use of Language–Normalizing Cyber as a Warfighting Domain