This article analyzes the military cyber policies of the United States and its critical Indo-Pacific allies, Australia and Japan, through the lens of Cyber Persistence Theory (CPT), a framework that has increasingly informed U.S. military cyber operations. It examines the extent to which these three countries have aligned, or not, their military cyber laws and policies with CPT principles. To do so, the article synthesizes the core tenets of CPT into a parsimonious policy analysis framework and applies it comparatively to recent cyber legislation and policy documents in the United States, Australia, and Japan. The analysis shows that, across all three cases, momentum and scale remain underdeveloped, despite more uneven progress on other CPT criteria. U.S. and Australian cyber forces are generally empowered to seize operational initiative, while Japanese cyber forces, despite significant recent legislative reforms, remain more constrained in practice. The U.S. has articulated cyberspace as a distinct military domain at the doctrinal level, whereas Australia and Japan continue to embed cyber operations primarily within conventional deterrence and kinetic domain frameworks. The article concludes by critically assessing current U.S. approaches to allied cyber operations in the Indo-Pacific. It proposes the concept of ‘integrated persistence’ as a policy-level alternative to integrated deterrence, aimed at strengthening CPT-consistent coordination across allied defense systems.
READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE