Cyber Defense Review

A Cyber Discussion

By CPT Erick Waage, CPT Brent Chapman | July 17, 2015

In 1920, the then CPT Dwight Eisenhower wrote an article, titled “Tank Discussion”, for the United States Infantry Association’s Infantry Journal championing the integration of motorization (particularly tanks) into combat arms maneuver. As a member of the minority, his faith in the potential of motorization and the tank resulted in intense scrutiny from the Infantry establishment, which almost ended his career early.  Undoubtedly, the tank later proved critical to the Army’s success in WWII.

The Strategic Initiatives Group at the Army Cyber Institute conducted a short experiment with the first three paragraphs of “A Tank Discussion”.  We replaced occurence of “tank” with “cyber” and updated some language to modern terminology and context.  The result is a remarkably relevant commentary given the current tensions in Army during the growth of the Cyber branch.

For your consideration is ACI SIG’s “A Cyber Discussion” and CPT Eisenhower “A Tank Discussion”:

Written by: The Army Cyber Institute’s Strategic Initiatives Group with special appearance from the Ghost of CPT Dwight D. Eisenhower

A Tank Discussion by Captain D.D. Eisenhower, Infantry

The establishment of the Cyber Branch in September 2014 by Army Secretary John McHugh and Army Chief of Staff General Odierno provided that here-after Cyber will be part of the Army service component. It therefore becomes increasingly important for combat arms officers to study the question of Cyber; its capabilities, limitations, and consequent possibilities of future employment.

Cyber, as a type of weapon, was a development in the late wars. Many officers who served with the fighting Brigade Combat Teams (BCT) never had an opportunity to take in an action supported by Cyber, and their knowledge of the power and deficiencies of Cyber is based on hearsay. Others took part in such combats when Cyber was improperly used, poorly manned, or under such adverse conditions that Cyber was practically helpless in trying to lend efficient aid to combat arms. As the number of Cyber teams that actually got to take part in the fighting with BCTs was very small, the number of officers of the Army who are openly advocates of this capability as a supporting weapon is correspondingly few.

As a result of these circumstances a great many officers are prone to denounce Cyber as a freak development of the recent war which has already outlived its usefulness. Others, and this class seems to be in the majority, have come into contact with Cyber so infrequently, and have heard so little either decidedly for or against it, that they simply ignore it in their calculation and mental pictures of future battles. Believing that the man that follows this course of thinking is falling into a grievous error, this paper is yet no brief to try to convince a skeptical reader that Cyber won the war. Cyber did not, and no one knows this better than the officers who commanded Cyber elements. And just as emphatically no other particular auxiliary arm won the war. The Infantry, aided and abetted by this various arms, did, however, it is safe to say that, lacking any one of them, the task of the Infantry would have been much more difficult. The sole purpose then of any discussion along these lines is to place such facts before the officer as will enable him to determine by sane and sound reasoning whether in future wars that Cyber will be a profitable adjunct to the infantry.



US Army Comments Policy
If you wish to comment, use the text box below. Army reserves the right to modify this policy at any time.

This is a moderated forum. That means all comments will be reviewed before posting. In addition, we expect that participants will treat each other, as well as our agency and our employees, with respect. We will not post comments that contain abusive or vulgar language, spam, hate speech, personal attacks, violate EEO policy, are offensive to other or similar content. We will not post comments that are spam, are clearly "off topic", promote services or products, infringe copyright protected material, or contain any links that don't contribute to the discussion. Comments that make unsupported accusations will also not be posted. The Army and the Army alone will make a determination as to which comments will be posted. Any references to commercial entities, products, services, or other non-governmental organizations or individuals that remain on the site are provided solely for the information of individuals using this page. These references are not intended to reflect the opinion of the Army, DoD, the United States, or its officers or employees concerning the significance, priority, or importance to be given the referenced entity, product, service, or organization. Such references are not an official or personal endorsement of any product, person, or service, and may not be quoted or reproduced for the purpose of stating or implying Army endorsement or approval of any product, person, or service.

Any comments that report criminal activity including: suicidal behaviour or sexual assault will be reported to appropriate authorities including OSI. This forum is not:

  • This forum is not to be used to report criminal activity. If you have information for law enforcement, please contact OSI or your local police agency.
  • Do not submit unsolicited proposals, or other business ideas or inquiries to this forum. This site is not to be used for contracting or commercial business.
  • This forum may not be used for the submission of any claim, demand, informal or formal complaint, or any other form of legal and/or administrative notice or process, or for the exhaustion of any legal and/or administrative remedy.

Army does not guarantee or warrant that any information posted by individuals on this forum is correct, and disclaims any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on any such information. Army may not be able to verify, does not warrant or guarantee, and assumes no liability for anything posted on this website by any other person. Army does not endorse, support or otherwise promote any private or commercial entity or the information, products or services contained on those websites that may be reached through links on our website.

Members of the media are asked to send questions to the public affairs through their normal channels and to refrain from submitting questions here as comments. Reporter questions will not be posted. We recognize that the Web is a 24/7 medium, and your comments are welcome at any time. However, given the need to manage federal resources, moderating and posting of comments will occur during regular business hours Monday through Friday. Comments submitted after hours or on weekends will be read and posted as early as possible; in most cases, this means the next business day.

For the benefit of robust discussion, we ask that comments remain "on-topic." This means that comments will be posted only as it relates to the topic that is being discussed within the blog post. The views expressed on the site by non-federal commentators do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Army or the Federal Government.

To protect your own privacy and the privacy of others, please do not include personally identifiable information, such as name, Social Security number, DoD ID number, OSI Case number, phone numbers or email addresses in the body of your comment. If you do voluntarily include personally identifiable information in your comment, such as your name, that comment may or may not be posted on the page. If your comment is posted, your name will not be redacted or removed. In no circumstances will comments be posted that contain Social Security numbers, DoD ID numbers, OSI case numbers, addresses, email address or phone numbers. The default for the posting of comments is "anonymous", but if you opt not to, any information, including your login name, may be displayed on our site.

Thank you for taking the time to read this comment policy. We encourage your participation in our discussion and look forward to an active exchange of ideas.